Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Innovations
2023
:3;
7
doi:
10.25259/CSDM_163_2022

Rationalization of the intrablister normal saline injection volume for getting faultless unilocular bulla

Department of Dermatology, Mukhtar Skin Centre, Katihar, Bihar, India.

*Corresponding author: Muhammed Mukhtar, Department of Dermatology, Mukhtar Skin Centre, Katihar, Bihar, India. drmmukhtar20@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mukhtar M, Mukhtar N. Rationalization of the intrablister normal saline injection volume for getting faultless unilocular bulla. CosmoDerma 2023;3:7.

PROBLEM

Even after 2 h of suction, the incidence of incomplete suction blisters is around 20–30% or more. An intra-blister injection of normal saline makes these blisters unilocular. However, the amount of saline to be injected into the blister has yet to be determined for the specific blister.[1,2] The size of the blister (hemisphere) can help determine how much saline to inject to achieve a uniform blister. Furthermore, it will prevent blister rupture caused by intrablister injection. To overcome this uncertainty and dilemma, a unique approach to intrablister injection based on blister volume is recommended.

SOLUTION

In general, syringes (10, 20 mL) are used to induce suction blisters. The radii of these syringes are about 8 mm and 10 mm, and the optimal volumes of the blisters (fluid-filled hemispheres) are around 1.33 mL and 2.09 mL respectively, as estimated by the formula for the volume of a hemisphere, which is 2/3 πr3 [Figure 1]. For injection, the calculated amount (volume) of normal saline is withdrawn in a 2 mL or 3 mL syringe. Following that, the blister fluid is withdrawn by the syringe without puncturing the roof of the blister, and the total volume in the syringe is recorded. After that, the calculated volume of fluid is gently reinjected into the blister away from the margin, without puncturing the blister roof. As a result, the appropriate fluid volume needed for the blister produced by 10 mL and 20 mL syringes can be made. The volume of blisters produced by devices having different radii can be calculated with the formula (2/3 πr3) to determine the optimal amount of normal saline for intrablister injection to obtain a complete, flawless, and unilocular bulla with a lower incidence of blister rupture.

The formula for the volume of a hemi-spherical-shaped suction blister.
Figure 1:
The formula for the volume of a hemi-spherical-shaped suction blister.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Surgical pearl: Suction syringe for epidermal grafting. Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:638-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Syringes versus Chinese cups in harvesting suction-induced blister graft: A randomized split-body study. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:1249-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,003

PDF downloads
442
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections