Pigmented contact dermatitis: A brief review
How to cite this article: Subburaj K, Vinay K, Bishnoi A, Kumaran MS, Parsad D. Pigmented contact dermatitis: A brief review. CosmoDerma 2022;2:43.
Hyperpigmentation is one of the common pigmentary complaints that brings the patient to dermatology services. Though there are multiple etiologies for hyperpigmentation, pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) remains a common diagnosis. The cosmetics containing dyes, preservatives, fragrances, bactericidal, emulsifiers/surfactants, and vehicles are the potential sources, and paraphenylenediamine, benzyl salicylate, brilliant lake red R, thiomersal and gallate mix are some of the most commonly implicated allergens.
The clinical manifestation includes diffuse or patchy brown to blue-black pigmentation of the cheeks, the outer surface of ears, preauricular region, temporal area, nape of the neck, and upper back. Patch testing plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of PCD and the testing series has to be selected according to the representative population. Given the chronicity of the disease, counseling patients against the use of cosmetics is challenging as the pigmentation tends to persist for longer durations inspite of stopping cosmetics. The pillars of treatment in PCD include recognition of the culprit allergen and preventing further exposure along with pharmacological therapy. This review provides a brief overview and an insight into the etiopathogenesis and management of PCD.
Acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation
Pigmented contact dermatitis
Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis
Pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) (Syn: Riehl’s melanosis, pigmented cosmetic dermatitis) is a non-eczematous presentation of contact dermatitis (CD), characterized by increased pigmentation with minimal or no inflammation. It is commonly seen among Asians and Latin Americans (skin phototype IV-VI) and presents as blotchy or reticulate slate-gray as well as brown hyperpigmentation without symptoms. The disease is common among middle-aged females and the face is the most common site of involvement. The frequently detected allergens in PCD are aniline dyes, bactericides, and fragrances. However, in the Indian scenario, paraphenylenediamine (PPD) and other hair dye-associated allergens are often the common culprits. The incidence of PCD and the commonly implicated allergens vary as per the cultural practices in different countries. Its occurrence also depends on regulations governing the sale and labeling of cosmetics. Such regulations may not be stringent in developing countries, leading to products with poor quality and allergic potential. A concise review was lacking in the literature and this review provides a brief overview of PCD.
After the end of World War, with improvement in economic status, industrialization, and trade, more women had access to cosmetics. This resulted in a proportionate increase in facial pigmentation and was referred to by various names including Riehl’s melanosis’ and lichen ruber planus cum pigmentatione. Riehl from Vienna was the first to describe Riehls’ melanosis during the first World War. He reported multiple patients with hyperpigmentation of the face in both sexes. Riehl could not explain the etiology but hypothesized that it could be due to wartime food substitutes. Minami and Noma proposed the entity to be a novel disease and framed the term “melanosis faciei feminae.” Later in the 1960s, melanosis facei feminae was hypothesized to be secondary to an allergic reaction to cosmetics. Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis is a variant of PCD was initially reported in Japan around 1970 by Nakayama. Saito in 1964 did patch testing using multiple cosmetics in a cohort of patients with facial pigmentation and found that 18 of 57 patients tested positively.
The common difficulty faced in the 60s when patch test was performed with cosmetics “as is” was that the contents of these cosmetics were unknown. Following the reports from Nakayama and Saito, there has been a steady decrease in the incidence of PCD, when strong contact sensitizers were removed by leading cosmetic enterprises. Recently the conditions lichen planus pigmentosus, Riehl’s melanosis, erythema dyschromicum perstans/ashy dermatosis have been described with the umbrella term acquired dermal macular pigmentation (ADMH).
Though PCD was initially described in Japan, it is more commonly reported in regions of the world with a dark-skinned population like Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The allergen profile and patch test positivity also vary from country to country. The effect of ethnicity on results of patch tests has been reported by an American study wherein they found a higher frequency of positive reactions to PPD in blacks and to fragrances and formaldehyde in whites. The Consumer Product Safety Commission identifies five allergens as “strong sensitizers” which include PPD and Europe and USA have legislation against the use of PPD on this basis. However, developing countries do not enforce such legislation resulting in the inadvertent use of allergens in cosmetics.
Various cosmetics, sensitizers, and allergens have been implicated in causing PCD. However, there seems to be a strong pigment-genetic interaction, given the higher incidence of PCD in patients with a dark complexion. The differences between PCD and allergic contact dermatitis have been described in Table 1.
|Pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD)||Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD)|
|Asymptomatic blotchy or reticulate slate-gray and brown hyperpigmentation involving the face||Dermatitis manifesting as eczematous oozy lesions, erythematous plaques|
|The allergen in PCD could be revealed only on patch testing in most cases||The causative allergen is usually evident in cases of ACD to cosmetics|
|Cetrimonium, gallate mix, and thimerosal are the common allergens causing PCD.||Methylchloroisothiazolinone methylisothiazolinone, fragrances, acrylates, toluene-2,5 diamine sulphate and paraphenylene diamine are the most common causes of ACD to cosmetics|
|Predominant finding in histopathology is pigment incontinence||Predominant finding in histopathology is spongiosis|
Osmundsen reported an epidemic of PCD in Copenhagen secondary to optic whiteners in washing powder. A mixture of two pyrazoline derivatives, Tinopal CH 3566 was found to be responsible for the pigmentation. Similarly, Pinol-Aguade et al. reported optic whitener as a cause of PCD in nearly half of their patients.
Naphthol AS, an azoic dye used in textiles was reported to be the culprit allergen in an epidemic outburst of PCD. Patients with relatively darker complexion developed PCD whereas classical eczema was seen in fair-skinned individuals. Sudan I, vaccine red, and brilliant lake red R are few dyes reported to induce PCD. Isolated cases with exposure to insoluble cutting oils, PPD, and other substances are also described.
Nakayama reported fragrances like benzyl salicylate, hydroxy-citronellal, geraniol, and cinnamic alcohol and essential oils (e.g., ylang-ylang and Jasmine absolute) to induce PCD. Mathias studied a patient with recurrent facial dermatitis with subsequent facial hyperpigmentation and chromium hydroxide in commercial toilet soap was found to be the allergen. Prurigo pigmentosa-like contact dermatitis has also been reported secondary to chrome in detergent, though the link is not well established.
Kwong et al., reported limonene, a terpene derived from citrus fruits used for its fresh lemon aroma, to be the allergen responsible for the antiperspirant-led PCD of the axilla. Though limonene on its own has low sensitization potential, hydroperoxides formed from its oxidation are potent sensitizers. PCD with airborne contact allergens has been reported with whitening dyes, packaging adhesive tapes, and musk ambrette present in incense.
Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis was reported in a 51-year-old white woman who wore a leather watch strap and paratertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin was found to be the culprit allergen in the strap.
In a recent study by Sharma et al., cosmetics were found to be the commonest culprit for PCD in India. Out of the 152 relevant patch test reactions with cosmetic allergens, the most frequent culprits were preservatives (n = 71, 46.7%), hair dye ingredients (n = 47, 31%), fragrances (n = 25, 16.4%), emulsifiers/surfactants (n = 5, 3.2%), and vehicles (n = 2, 1.3%).
Various individual components in cosmetics have been reported to result in PCD in the literature. A solvent, benzyl salicylate used as odorant, fixative, and sunscreen leads to PCD which usually takes a longer time to resolve (sometimes more than 1 year). PCD to lipsticks has been reported with coal tar dyes like CI 15800 brilliant lake red and other 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol derivatives. Other allegens reported causing lip PCD to include ester gum, isopalmityl diglyceryl sebacate, ricinoleic acid and dipentaerythritol fatty acid ester (dipentaerythritolesters with hexahydroxy stearate and rosinate). Musk moskene produces a sweet fragrance with a creamy powder note in cosmetics. Hayakawa et al., reported a patient with slate brown pigmentation after using a cheek rouge containing musk moskene.
Many cultural practices followed by specific population can result in PCD. ‘Kumkum’ is usually applied by women to the center of the forehead or on the frontal hair parting to represent the marital status in India. Among patients of kumkum dermatitis, Nath and Thappa reported 76% and 24% of patients to have PCD and allergic contact dermatitis, respectively. Clinically either brown or slate gray colored pigmentation suggestive of lichen planus pigmentosus was found without overt dermatitis. “Kumkum” commonly contains brilliant lake red R, Sudan I, aminoazobenzene, canaga oil, fragrances, groundnut oil, tragacanth gum, turmeric powder, thimerosal, gallate mix, PPD, Kathon CG, benzotriazol, tert-butyl hydroquinone, parabens, azo dyes, mercury, and lead sulphide.
The incidence of hair dye-induced skin reactions is increasing as many people dye their hair periodically for cosmetic reasons. PPD was reported to be the most frequent sensitizer in a retrospective study by Samanta et al. In a Korean study by Woo et al., henna was found to be associated with slate-greyish dyspigmented patches over the hairline. Patch testing performed in patients with ACD and PCD following hair dye use revealed that ACD was associated with PPD whereas natural henna powder was associated with PCD. In spite of being considered safe, henna can also lead to immediate and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. In a recent study by Bishnoi et al., it was found that in a total of 108 patients with acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation (ADMH), the frequency of positive patch tests was higher within "own hair colors" than that with PPD in Indian standard series. There are several components in the hair dyes like primary intermediates or precursors (PPD, toluene-2,5-diamine), developers (hydrogen peroxide, which may contain ammonia), and couplers (resorcinol, 3-aminophenol, and 4-aminophenol). It has been reported that though PPD is not an allergen on its own but the oxidation products of PPD like 40-nitroaniline and 4,40-azodianiline are strong sensitizers.
Next to hair dyes, one of the common cosmetics used to cause PCD among patients with skin of color is the fairness cream. Lavender absolute, musk mix, cetyl alcohol, thimerosal, sorbic acid, germall 11, and benzyl salicylate are the most common allergens in fairness creams.
Medications turned into allergens
Inui et al., studied hyperpigmentation occurring as a complication of diphenylcyclopropene in alopecia areata totalis (AAT) and alopecia areata universalis (AAU). About 11 (5.91%) of the 186 patients had hyperpigmentation and all these patients had severe AA. The patients with pigmentation showed poor response to contact immunisation. Garcia-Gavin et al., reported paradoxical hyperpigmentation in a patient who applied kojic acid for lightening of lentigines on arms, and a patch test with kojic acid 1% aqua was positive. Single case reports of PCD secondary to minoxidil and green tea have also been reported. Common allergens implicated in PCD have been listed in Table 2.
|Optical whiteners||Tinopal CH 3566|
|Brilliant lake red|
|Solvent orange 8|
|Cosmetics pigments||Pigment orange 3|
|Pigment red 3|
|Pigment red 49|
|Pigment red 53|
|Pigment red 64|
|Azoic solvents||Solvent orange 2|
|Solvent orange 8|
In patients of PCD, repeated exposure to low levels of allergens produces a type IV hypersensitivity reaction resulting in basal cell vacuolization with melanin incontinence. The involvement of photo-exposed sites and the property of photosensitization by few allergens suggests ultraviolet light exposure as an important attributing factor.
In a recent study by Woo et al., the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) β and progesterone receptor (PR) was analyzed in the lesional and the surrounding skin biopsies of Riehl’s melanosis cases and controls. There was an elevated dermal ERβ immunostaining intensity, dermal ERβ, and dermal PR expressions as well as ERβ and PR mRNAs expression in the lesional skin of patients. This abnormal expression strengthens the fact that receptors of estrogen and progesterone are involved in the pathomechanism of RM.
The onset of pigmentation in PCD is insidious and usually with no preexisting inflammation. The clinical symptoms are usually mild and because of the slower clearance of dermal pigment the lesions persist for a longer time in spite of the withdrawal of the allergen. The skin manifestations can be diffuse or patchy brown hyperpigmentation on the cheeks, ears (outer surface, helix, and lobule), temporals and preauricular regions, nape of the neck, and the upper half of the back, inframammary area, and arms [Figure 1]. The pigmentation can be of different shades of black, purple, or blue-black. Erythematous macules or papules, slight erythema, and exfoliation suggest a mild contact dermatitis can be observed rarely. Sometimes the allergen responsible can produce pigmentation where the contact is maximal like PCD secondary to textiles commonly involve the front of the thighs and axillae (without involving the vault, Figure 2). The clinical manifestations can overlap with entities such as lichen planus pigmentosus and ashy dermatosis.
Dermoscopy is a non-invasive tool to assist in the diagnosis of PCD. The most common findings are gray dots or globules, which are arranged in an arcuate, semi-arcuate, or hexagonal fashion. Exaggerated pseudo network with a background blue-grey hue and telangiectatic vessels can also be seen.
Reflectance confocal microscopy show pigment incontinence, mildly refractive cells (lymphocytes), dilated blood vessels and obscured papillary rims, and total or partial obliteration of the ring-like structures around the dermal papillae indicating basal layer vacuolization.
Patch and photo-patch testing in PCD
Patch testing is done with standard series, cosmetic series, and fragrance series comprised of indigenous allergens to which the local population is more susceptible. The readings are to be taken at 48 hrs and on the 7th day. The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scoring system is helpful in interpreting the results as given in Table 3. In photo-patch testing, two sets of patch tests would be applied over the upper back and after 24 hours the readings will be recorded. Later only one set will be exposed to 14 J/cmsq of UVA. The second reading would be taken at 48 hours following UVA exposure (day 3). According to the standard photo-patch criteria, the photoallergic reaction is labeled when only the UVA exposed side has a positive result. If there is patch test positivity on both the sides but with an equal grading or with UVA exposed site having >1+ positivity then a diagnosis of contact dermatitis or contact dermatitis with photoaggravation is given respectively [Figure 3]. In the case of PCD, delayed brown pigmentation can also be seen on patch testing. Based on the history or examination of the patient the clinical relevance of a patch test positivity can be labeled as per no/past/present relevance. Samanta et al., performed patch testing in PCD patients with Indian cosmetic series. About 79% of patients showed patch test positivity with significance in 71%. The colorant PPD was reported as the most common allergen (37%), followed by fragrances (18%), preservatives (15%), anti-microbial (11%), and emulsifier and anti-oxidants (each 8%). In a retrospective analysis by Sharma et al., cetrimonium bromide, gallate mix, thimerosal, and skin lightening creams were found to be the common allergens. The studies done in patch testing of PCD have been summarized in Table 4.
|?||Faint macular erythema only||Doubtful|
|+||Erythema, infiltration and possibly papules||Weak positive reaction|
|++||Erythema, infiltration, papules and vesicles||Strong positive reaction|
|+++||Bullous lesions||Extreme positive reaction|
|IR||Irritant reaction||Irritant reaction|
|Study||Sample size||Most common allergens in the study|
|Trattner et al. 1999, Israel||29||Perfume mix (n = 6), Fragrance mix (n = 4)
Nickel (n = 3), Formaldehyde (n = 2), Potassium dichromate (n = 1)
|Nath and Thappa 2007, India||35||Thiomersal (n = 18), Gallate mix (n = 12), Kumkum (n = 7), PPD (n = 1), MI/MCI (n = 1)|
|Tienthavom et al. 2014, Thailand||10||Nickel (n = 8), Fragrance mix 2 (n = 3), Cobalt (n = 2)|
|Sharma et al. 2018, India||74||Cetrimonium bromide (n = 20), Thiomersal (n = 16)
Skin lightening creams (n = 14), Gallate mix (n = 13)
|Samanta et al., 2019, India||38||Paraphenylenediamine (n = 14), Cetrimide (n = 3), Lavender absolute (n = 2), Musk mix (n = 1), Thiomersal (n = 1)|
|Bishnoi et al., 2019, India||108 (ADMH)||Paraphenylenediamine (n = 53), Fragrance (n = 6), Biodyes and red henna (n = 6)|
|Sharma et al., 2017, India||50 (LPP)||Para-phenylenediamine (n = 5,) Nickel sulphate (n = 3),Colophony (n = 2), Perfume mix (n = 2) and Fragrance mix (n = 2)|
If patch testing is negative or equivocal, due to the low concentration of the allergen in cosmetic and fragrance series there is a role for repeated open application test (ROAT). In case of an equivocal result in ROAT done on the forearm, the test can be repeated with the cosmetic of the patient over affected areas or face.
The histological findings in PCD include basal cell vacuolar degeneration along with the involvement of pilosebaceous units accompanied by melanophages in the papillary dermis. Similar findings were observed from sites of positive allergic patch tests. The penetration of allergen into the hair follicles can be seen by an extension of inflammation into the upper pilosebaceous units. The site of the positive patch test has a predominance of CD4+ cells over CD8+ cells, however, in chronic skin lesions, they were equal with a mild increase in CD8+ cells. An interesting observation of an enhanced melanization of the epidermis (presence of melanin throughout epidermis above the basal layer) along pigment incontinence in the dermis has been reported in ADMH.
Quantitative assessment and quality of life in PCD
Acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation area and severity index (DPASI), is a tool utilized in the assessment of disease severity in ADMH quantitatively. The face and the neck are divided into six different segments and using dermoscopy the severity is graded and multiplied by the surface area involved with a maximum score of 40.
Cosmetic disfigurement in PCD can lead to significantly low self-esteem, anxiety and depression, and social stigma. In a cross-sectional study of 52 patients, it was found that the mean score of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MELASQOL) were high in patients with PCD upon comparison with melasma and healthy controls. The lower educational status and long duration of the disease were associated with poor quality of life. Dabas et al., reported that in a total of 100 patients with ADMH, 18.7%, 24.1%, and 14.3% had anxiety, depression, and somatoform disorder respectively along with a positive correlation between severity and the point prevalence of anxiety and depression.
The patients should be adequately counseled regarding the causative role of cosmetics or textiles and that the hyperpigmentation can persist despite cessation of their usage. The general measures in the treatment of PCD include avoidance of the causal allergen, broad-spectrum sunscreens, and sun-protective behavior.
Treatment options include cosmetic camouflage, topical agents including hydroquinone, topical corticosteroids, retinoids, vitamin C, azelaic acid, with or without light to medium depth chemical peels (trichloroacetic acid, glycolic acid) or light-based therapies. A recent study showed the effectiveness of mid-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser targeting the deep pigmentation of PCD. Bhari et al., reported only a modest improvement with Q-switched Nd:YAG in clinical and histopathological aspects of lichen planus pigmentosus. This discrepancy may be due to variation in the laser parameters.
A combination of one or more treatment options should be tried in resistant cases. A significant improvement in PCD has been reported with a triple combination of salicylic acid peels, oral glycyrrhizin compound, and vitamin C. Another study used a combination of therapies including low-fluence, 1064-nm, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, hydroquinone cream, and oral tranexamic acid and reported success in the majority of patients. Long term management and prevention of PCD can be assured by legislation prohibiting the use of allergens in cosmetic products The various studies on the treatment of PCD have been summarised in Table 5.
|Study||Treatment given||Follow up||Results||Complication|
|Cho et al.n
= 21 (Koreans,
type III to IV)
|Six sittings of mid fluence
(laser intensity of 3.5-5 J/
cm2, 5-mm spot size, and 10
Hz frequency). Q-switched
Nd-YAG 1064 nm laser with an interval of
40 days in between two sittings
|34 weeks||Out of 21 patients, two showed >75%
improvement, eight and six patients 50-75% and 25-50% improvement, respectively.
<25% improvement was seen in two patients While three had no improvement.
|Pruritus and prolonged erythema was seen in one patient each|
|Xu et al. 10 (Chinese,
type III to V)
|Oral tranexamic acid 250
mg BD for 6 months with
150 mg oral glycyrrhizin
in the first 3
Improvement was seen in seven patients.While two patients had
25-50% improvement, one had <25%
|Kwon et al. eight (Koreans,
type III to V)
1064 Nd-YAG laser
at 3-week intervals.
Hydroquinone 4% cream
topically every night andoral tranexamic acid 250 mg/day
|54 weeks||Three patients and five patients had >75%
50-75% improvement respectively.
|Chung et al. 6 (Koreans,
Fitzpatrick III and
Q-switched Nd-YAG laser
with fluence of 2-4 J/cm2,
frequency 10 Hz and spot
size of 7 mm every 2 weeks
for 4 months
|20 weeks||Four patients and two patients had 50-75%
|Wang et al.,
three (Chinese, Fitzpatrick III and IV)
|Glycyrrhizin compound (150 mg/d), vitamin C (100 mg/d), and salicylic acid 30% peels every 2 weeks.||24 weeks||All three patients had significant improvement.||Mild burning|
|Acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation|
|Bishnoi et al., 43 (Indian, Fitzpatrick III-V)||Mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day for 24 weeks||36 weeks||One patient had >50 % decrease in dermal pigmentation area and severity index. >40-50% in 10 patients, >30-40% in 15 patients.||Leucopenia in one patient, Transaminitis and hyperbilirubinemia in two patients.|
There has been considerable progress in our knowledge about the disease mechanism and possible allergens that cause PCD. Dermoscopy and patch/photo-patch testing can be used for establishing the diagnosis and identifying possible allergens. Treatment is challenging as the pigmentation is recalcitrant or is very slow to resolve. An updated knowledge about the disease can aid dermatologists in efficient management of this enigmatic disease.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- feminae. 1950;12:73.Melanosis faciei.
- [Google Scholar]
- Hifuka Rinsho. 1964;6:333.Relationship between cosmetics and riehl’s melanosis.
- [Google Scholar]
- Med Cutanea. 1971;5:249.Dermatitis por blanquedores opticos.
- [Google Scholar]
- 1974 Kanehara Shuppan Co.
- Environ Dermatol. 1996;3:348-51.Pigmented lip dermatitis caused by ester gum.
- [Google Scholar]
- Environ Dermatol. 2003;10:70-4.Allergic contact cheilitis due to isopalmityl diglyceryl sebacate and pentaerythritol rosinate in the lipsticks.
- [Google Scholar]