Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
2025
:5;
113
doi:
10.25259/CSDM_123_2025

Skin of the future? - Decoding electronic skin and a comprehensive review of the latest developments

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Sushmitha Dharani Sankar, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. sushmithajipmer@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dharani Sankar S. Skin of the future? - Decoding electronic skin and a comprehensive review of the latest developments. CosmoDerma. 2025;5:113. doi: 10.25259/CSDM_123_2025

Abstract

Electronic skin (“E-skin”), also known as artificial skin, is a revolutionary technology that mimics the properties of human skin, making it seamlessly integrate with the human body. It has emerged as a cutting-edge technology in the world of wearables and healthcare monitoring. This technology is also being studied for its potential therapeutic applications in various fields, including dermatology. Although there has been extensive research about E-skin going on around the world in the last few decades, the medical and dermatology fraternity has limited exposure to this hot research topic. Hence, this article aims to decode the architecture, functioning, and technological advances in E-skin.

Keywords

Biosensing
Electronic skin
Wearable electronic device
Wearable technology

INTRODUCTION

As one of the body’s most versatile organs, the skin plays a crucial role in maintaining overall health through its numerous functions. One such unique function is the ability to sense different stimuli, such as touch, pressure, pain, and temperature. Most importantly, it can withstand stress with its ability to stretch and self-repair. Taking inspiration from nature, scientists have developed electronic skin using advanced materials and nanotechnology to simulate human skin and its abilities.

“Smart skin” or “Electronic skin” refers to a super-thin electronic gadget that adheres to the skin like a tattoo and can measure a wide range of parameters in real-time analysis. E-skin originally was defined as a “large-area, flexible array of sensors with data processing capabilities, which can be used to cover the entire surface of a machine or even a part of a human body.”[1] These are designed to monitor skin health by analyzing various parameters, such as pressure, temperature, hydration, oil levels, pH balance, and ultraviolet exposure. Furthermore, research on smart skin is increasingly focusing on the detection of biomarkers such as electrolytes, metabolites, proteins, and hormones in human sweat. Electronic skin can also be equipped with transdermal drug delivery systems to improve its real-time, non-invasive, dynamic therapeutic capabilities. What sets the E-skin apart from traditional wearables is its ability to track data at the molecular level, making it invaluable for health monitoring, early diagnosis, and even personalized treatments.

E-skin has been studied widely for its application in the field of robotics since the 1970s. Later, these tactile sensors were extrapolated for their applications in prostheses and mechanical arms. Thereafter, the applications of E-skin have grown in multitude for its functionality in robotics, prostheses, health monitoring, and therapeutics, making it one of the trending areas of research. The scope of an E-skin can range from a small patch to a large area covering a limb, with corresponding uses for health monitoring and robotics, respectively. It enables the detection of action-related information, such as slipping and grasping, while providing detailed tactile feedback, including texture and the hardness/ softness of contact forces. It can even accurately localize the pressure and give sensory feedback in real time. Using multifunctional sensors, it can accurately monitor various health-related biometrics in real time. This can be of use in remotely monitoring a patient’s vitals, sending data directly to the physician, thereby helping with real-time diagnosis and timely treatment.

OVERVIEW/ARCHITECTURE OF ELECTRONIC SKIN

Fabricating a high-performing, mechanically flexible, and stretchable E-skin similar to the human epidermis is a challenging task. A simple outline of the anatomy of E-skin is shown in Figure 1. The three main components of E-skin include a substrate with a power supply, interconnected sensors, and a wireless transmission network.[2] These building blocks should have certain requirements to meet the definition of an ideal E-skin, which are summarized in Table 1.

A framework depiction of an electronic skin with a flexible substrate with a power supply, inbuilt sensors, and data transmission systems.
Figure 1:
A framework depiction of an electronic skin with a flexible substrate with a power supply, inbuilt sensors, and data transmission systems.
Table 1: Key characteristics of an ideal E-skin.
An ideal electronic skin should possess the following characteristics
  1. Ultrathin structure with high sensitivity to detect minute changes

  2. Flexible and stretchable

  3. Conformability and self-healing capacity

  4. Self-powered with low-energy consumption

  5. Bio-compatible and bio-degradable

  6. Real-time processing of data with instant feedback

Substrate

The most basic property of an E-skin is its ability to conform easily. To achieve this, building a flexible substrate is necessary. Use of intrinsically stretchable polymers is preferred due to their stability and longevity.[3] Moreover, the use of organic substrates will ensure easy integration with the sensors and offer good chemical functionality. The most commonly used polymeric substrates were polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS),[4-7] polyurethane (PU),[8,9] polyethylene terephthalate (PET),[10,11] polyimide,[12] and parylene.[13] Scientists have even developed a textile-based substrate using a silk fabric-derived carbon textile.[14] Of these, PDMS is by far the most widely used owing to its manufacturability, affordability, biocompatibility, and chemical inertness.[15] The drawbacks faced were delamination from the skin due to sweat and moisture. However, this may not be suitable for application to large surfaces.

PU-based substrates showed good flexibility and elasticity,[16] while, on the other hand, polyimide showed excellent stability under extreme bending.[17] Parylene, a thermoplastic polymer-based substrate, is known for its chemical inertness,[18] biocompatibility, and low permeability to moisture. A sensor based on parylene as substrate was developed to detect temperature and pressure simultaneously by Bae et al.[19]

Recently, a low-cost substrate based on recycled paper was developed by researchers for monitoring health parameters such as temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure.[20]

Sensor technology

The performance of E-skin tactile sensors heavily relies on the sensing material’s properties and mechanism. To optimize performance, materials with excellent electrical, optical, and conducting properties are utilized. These materials are integrated onto thin, flexible substrates, enabling stretchability and mechanical stability.

Traditional substrate materials, such as PDMS, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyimide, and PET, are favored for their thin, stretchable properties. The sensing materials employed in E-skin tactile sensors encompass a range of metals, semiconductors, and nanomaterials, including metal nanoparticles and nanowires of platinum, gold, and silver, semiconductor nanowires of silicon and zinc oxide, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and graphene, a recent and promising addition. The design of the E-skin device is crucial, having a direct impact on its performance. This mainly relies on the correct identification of active sensing material with desirable properties and control of its microstructure. The sensing mechanism also plays a vital role in choosing the sensing material and incorporating it into the device design. The various transduction mechanisms include piezo-resistivity, capacitance, piezoelectricity, and triboelectricity.[21] The advantages and disadvantages of the various sensor types are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Comparison of various sensor mechanisms.
Sensor mechanism Advantages Disadvantages
Piezoresistive sensors Simple design
Easy to build and read
Low cost
Low sensitivity
Temperature sensitivity
High energy consumption
Capacitive sensors High sensitivity and spatial resolution
Fast response time
Mechanical robustness
Excellent stability
Crosstalk
Sensitive to surrounding noise
Piezoelectric sensors Self-powered and less bulky
High sensitivity and accuracy
Can detect a wide range of dynamic frequencies
High cost
Complex to build
Not suited for static measurements
Triboelectric sensors Simple design
Low cost
High performance
Self-healing
Low precision
Restricted to detecting dynamic inputs
Sensitive to wear and tear

Piezo-resistive sensors

They facilitate the transduction of force variations into measurable resistance changes, which can be readily detected by electrical measurement systems.[21] Examples include gold nanowires stretched in flexible rubber latex.[22] These were used to monitor movements of the arm, cheek, throat, pulse detection, and various hand positions. Other materials studied include CNTs, graphite nano-plates, graphene/ vertically grown poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (PEDOT) nano-fiber/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-co-hexafluoropropene nanohybrid films.

Capacitance-based sensors

Capacitance is the capacity of a material or device to store electric charge. Scientists have devised a novel textile-based pressure sensor with Ag nanoparticle composites coated with elastic rubber, which can be integrated with gloves and clothes.[23] A microfluidic sensor was fabricated using deformable rubber microfluidic channels sandwiched between two layers of silver nanowires.

Piezoelectricity-based sensors

The sensors based on the above-discussed transduction principles need an external power source or a battery to operate, which can add bulk and compromise their practicality. Sensors based on piezoelectric mechanisms can generate electrical signals directly. A piezoelectric wearable E-skin made of electrospun poly L-lactic acid nanofibers was studied to monitor human physiological signals and other dynamic tactile stimuli.[24] Another novel experimental E-skin was designed to detect glucose levels from body fluid based on piezoelectricity.[25]

Triboelectricity-based sensors

Triboelectricity works on the principle of surface electricity, i.e., when two thin materials come in contact, charge transfer occurs, and electric potential is generated. A self-powered, flexible E-skin based on this mechanism was developed using PDMS film sandwiched between carbon fiber electrodes.[26] Similar PDMS-based devices were also developed using zinc oxide nano-rod arrays.[27] A novel, flexible, and pressure-sensitive device was developed by incorporating nickel nanostructured particles into a hydrogen-bonded organic supramolecular polymer matrix, resulting in a material with excellent mechanical and electrical properties, as well as self-healing capabilities.[28]

Energy harvesting/power supply

One of the major areas of challenge in fabricating an E-skin is providing a long-lasting power supply, as wearables require independence from interchangeable batteries. The use of multiple microsensors and finite signal transmission networks rapidly increases the energy consumption. Although there has been significant progress in the available power units, they still carry certain restrictions such as frequent charging and battery replacement.[25] Hence, the future of E-skin relies on creating a device that has minimal power consumption, low cost, is comfortable to wear, and is self-powered. So far, numerous studies have been conducted to harvest energy from various environmental sources[26] as listed in Figure 2. The highest power conversion efficiency was recorded with flexible photovoltaic cells (InGaP-GaAs tandem solar cell).[29] Other approaches included Cu(In, Ga) Se2 solar cells,[30] perovskite-based solar cells,[31] dye-sensitizer electrolytes,[32] and quantum dots.[33] The most common strategies used for mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion were the piezoelectric effect and the triboelectric effect. The materials studied, operating based on the piezoelectric effect, were ZnO nanostructures,[34] lead zirconate titanate films,[35] and barium titanate nanoparticle films.[36]

Environmental energy sources for electronic skin.
Figure 2:
Environmental energy sources for electronic skin.

Triboelectricity works on the principle of contact electricity, i.e., when two mechanical surfaces come in contact with each other, an electrical impulse is generated. Fan et al., reported the first flexible triboelectric nanogenerator, using PET polymer substrates and Au/Pd-Au metal sheets.[37]

Wireless data transfer

Wireless communication is used widely in our daily lives, eliminating the need for complex wires and cables, allowing hassle-free data transfer across disconnected systems. The wireless communication protocols used for the transfer of data from the E-skin systems rely mainly on the range. For example, radiofrequency identification and near field communications[38,39] are preferred for short-range, Bluetooth for medium-range,[40] and Wi-Fi for long-range transmission.[41]

ADVANCES IN ELECTRONIC SKIN TECHNOLOGY

E-skin devices are subjected to continuous wear and tear as intimate contact and movement with skin causes fatigue and microcracks.[42] Usage of self-healing materials increases longevity and heals any microcracks, thus avoiding major structural damage. This was achieved using microcapsules, which released a healing agent in the form of a liquid monomer upon contact with the microcracks.[43] Other methods studied include the incorporation of conductive fillers into a self-healing network, use of covalent/non-covalent/hydrogen bonds,[44] and use of metal droplets distributed in a silicon elastomer.[45,46]

To mimic human skin, E-skin should be comfortable to wear for a prolonged period of time and thus, biocompatible. Hence, breathable materials with interconnected pores can be substituted as substrates to provide better permeability, as demonstrated by Shao et al.,[47] who developed a PVDF nanofiber membrane.

With continuing advancement in the field of E-skin technology and artificial intelligence, integration of both these fields is the need of the hour. Although the current research efforts are focused on fabricating E-skins for the collection of various data, research on translating these inputs into meaningful outcomes is lacking. This is possible only by creating a closed-loop system with integrated machine learning for better data processing and pattern recognition.[48]

APPLICATIONS OF ELECTRONIC SKIN

E-skin can be broadly categorized into two types [Figure 3], depending on their applications: (a) Artificial E-skins for robotics and prosthetics, which can replicate the functions of human skin, and (b) biomedical E-skins for real-time collection and analysis of physiological data for diagnosing and providing timely therapeutic interventions.

Types of E-skin.
Figure 3:
Types of E-skin.

Robots equipped with artificial E-skins can obtain precise information, such as motion control and somatosensation, from their surroundings, which helps in the execution of complex tasks. Furthermore, they can be integrated with prosthetic devices to reciprocate essential human bodily functions like sensation. This is particularly useful in patients with neurological deficits, as in the case of leprosy.

Biomedical E-skins can be either diagnostic or therapeutic. Biomedical E-skins can be beneficial for collecting and monitoring real-time electrophysiological data such as brain signals, sweat collection and analysis, blood pressure, cardiac and muscle activities on a day-to-day basis in medicine and healthcare. Real-time sweat analysis is a novel noninvasive alternative to invasive blood testing owing to its convenience in sample collection and real-time monitoring of biochemical parameters.[49] Koh et al., have developed a closed microfluidic system with inbuilt micropores that harvest the sweat from sweat pores, which are stored and later analyzed for biomarkers.[27] These wearable devices enabled the wireless measurement and transmission of various physiological parameters, including total sweat loss, lactate, pH, chloride, and glucose concentrations, using colorimetric detection.[27,49,50] This could also benefit in the detection of various analytes that are excreted by sweat, such as alcohol and heavy metals.[51] Flexible and wearable electronics could offer numerous benefits to the field of sports medicine, in view of its comfortability and continuous fitness tracking. It could be used for the identification of various chemical metabolites and cardiac markers that could predict disease events before the onset of symptoms.

E-skin patches based on functional hydrogels are proven to be promising candidates as soft bio-integrated electronics for accelerated wound healing and wound repair, owing to their high water content and low Young’s modulus comparable to those of biological tissues. The various hydrogels studied for this purpose include poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEA) hydrogel, Ag flake hydrogel, PEDOT: Polystyrenestyrenesulfonate hydrogel, polydopamine (PDA) hydrogel, and PVA hydrogel. The efficacy of these was studied on mouse models, where wound healing was promoted by electrical field-stimulated fibroblast migration, proliferation, and differentiation and also by iontophoretic drug delivery.[52]

CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS

Fabricating an E-skin comes with a lot of challenges due to the ultrafine build nature of flexible electronics. The currently available planar electronics are rigid, lacking flexibility. The research requirements vary according to the intended use of E-skin.

As artificial E-skins are not intended for wearing on human skin, their requirements are those of robustness, better adhesion to devices, and longevity.

On the other hand, biomedical E-skins are desired to collect reliable electrophysiological data by direct integration on human skin. To achieve this and to reduce the side effects, it is crucial that both materials are cohesive with matched elastic moduli. In addition to this, biomedical E-skins need to be biocompatible, breathable, and self-healing for long-term operation.

Although there are laudable benefits of biomedical E-skin, we should take it with a pinch of salt for all the masked potential hazards. It could have various biophysical effects on the biological functioning of human skin, ranging from inflammation, interference with keratinocyte migration, affecting the skin barrier, and the normal desquamation of stratum corneum, to altered function of various receptors resulting in pigmentation and accelerated photoaging.[53] It could have other effects related to allergy and disease, which are yet to be known.

Another paramount challenge is in developing a data transmission system with higher bandwidth and better energy efficiency. In addition, managing the storage demands of a huge database can be quite challenging.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

There have been significant advancements over the recent years in the technologies related to the fabrication of E-skin. The foremost challenge is to make an ideal E-skin with perception abilities, mimicking human skin in all aspects. Integrating a variety of sensors into one device can make it multifunctional.

Owing to the wear and tear associated with prolonged use of E-skin, the new generation of E-skin should have self-healing capacity, as discussed above.

Another key advancement is flexible printed circuit technology, which will replace the traditional rigid circuit boards and hence reduce the overall power consumption.

More recently, machine learning has been integrated with E-skin systems to enhance device control accuracy and to process data efficiently. This convergence can be of help in promoting the translation of these devices to clinical practice and patient care.

CONCLUSION

The advancements in E-skin materials and structures have been remarkable, opening exciting new avenues for research. However, the development of sophisticated materials with superior dexterity, sensing capabilities, and malleability remains a pressing need. To translate these innovations into affordable and accessible patient care solutions, further research and funding are essential.

Nevertheless, the future of E-skin holds tremendous promise, with vast applications across various fields, including dermatology.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , . Sensitive skin. IEEE Sens J. 2001;1:41-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. E-skin: The dawn of a New Era of on-body monitoring systems. Micromachines (Basel). 2021;12:1091.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Mechanics of epidermal electronics. J Appl Mech. 2012;79:031022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:788-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . 3D printing of highly stretchable strain sensors based on carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20:1800425.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Stress and magnetic field bimode detection sensors based on flexible CI/CNTs-PDMS sponges. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:30774-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Novel electrically conductive porous PDMS/carbon nanofiber composites for deformable strain sensors and conductors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:14207-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. A flexible and highly pressure-sensitive graphemepolyurethane sponge based on fractured microstructure design. Adv Mater. 2013;25:6692-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Polyurethane foam coated with a multi-walled carbon nanotube/polyaniline nanocomposite for a skin-like stretchable array of multi-functional sensors. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9:e448.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . A large-area, flexible pressure sensor matrix with organic field-effect transistors for artificial skin applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9966-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3002.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Ultrafast optical reduction of graphene oxide sheets on colorless polyimide film for wearable chemical sensors. NPG Asia Mater. 2016;8:e315.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Techniques and considerations in the microfabrication of parylene C microelectromechanical systems. Micromachines. 2018;9:422.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Integrated textile sensor patch for real-time and multiplex sweat analysis. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaax0649.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . PDMS with designer functionalities-properties, modifications strategies, and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2018;83:97-134.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Conformal printing of electrically small antennas on three-dimensional surfaces. Adv Mater. 2011;23:1335-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . Flexible organic transistors and circuits with extreme bending stability. Nat Mater. 2010;9:1015-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Wafer-scale design of lightweight and transparent electronics that wraps around hairs. Nat Commun. 2014;5:2982.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Pressure/temperature sensing bimodal electronic skin with stimulus discriminability and linear sensitivity. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1803388.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Recyclable nonfunctionalized paper-based ultralow-cost wearable health monitoring system. Adv Mater Technol. 2017;2:1600228.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . A brief review on E-skin and its multifunctional sensing applications. Curr Smart Mater. 2019;4:3-14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Highly stretchy black gold E-skin nanopatches as highly sensitive wearable biomedical sensors. Adv Electron Mater. 2015;1:1400063.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Conductive fiber-based ultrasensitive textile pressure sensor for wearable electronics. Adv Mater. 2015;27:2433-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. Human skin interactive self-powered wearable piezoelectric bio-e-skin by electrospun poly-Llactic acid nanofibers for non-invasive physiological signal monitoring. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:7352-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Flexible ultralow-power sensor interfaces for E-skin. Proc IEEE. 2019;107:2084-105.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Recent progress in self-powered multifunctional e-skin for advanced applications. Exploration (Beijing). 2022;2:20210112.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:366ra165.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Stretchable and self-healing polymers and devices for electronic skin. Prog Polym Sci. 2013;38:1961-77.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , . Flexible thin-film tandem solar cells with >30% efficiency. IEEE J Photovolt. 2014;4:729-33.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Advanced alkali treatments for high-efficiency cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on flexible substrates. Adv Energy Mater. 2019;9:1900408.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Enabling flexible allperovskite tandem solar cells. Joule. 2019;3:2193-204.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Flexible platinum-free fiber-shaped dye sensitized solar cell with 10.28% efficiency. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2019;2:2870-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . A review on quantum dot sensitized solar cells: Past, present and future towards carrier multiplication with a possibility for higher efficiency. Sol Energy. 2020;203:210-39.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators using metal-doped ZnO-PVDF films. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2020;305:111912.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , . Enhancement in energy storage and piezoelectric performance of three phase (PZT/MWCNT/PVDF) composite. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;244:122639.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Organic phosphonic acid-modified BaTiO3/P(VDF-TrFE) composite with high output in both voltage and power for flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators. Mater Today Energy. 2020;17:100489.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Flexible triboelectric generator. Nano Energy. 2012;1:328-34.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Battery-free, wireless, and flexible electrochemical patch for in situ analysis of sweat cortisol via near field communication. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;172:112782.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Sweat-activated biocompatible batteries for epidermal electronic and microfluidic systems. Nat Electron. 2020;3:554-62.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Fully untethered battery-free biomonitoring electronic tattoo with wireless energy harvesting. Sci Rep. 2020;10:5539.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Soft wrist-worn multi-functional sensor array for real-time hand gesture recognition. IEEE Sens J. 2022;22:17505-14.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , et al. A self-healable, highly stretchable, and solution processable conductive polymer composite for ultrasensitive strain and pressure sensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1705551.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature. 2001;409:794-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , . Self-healing and superstretchable conductors from hierarchical nanowire assemblies. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2786.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. Self-assembled three dimensional network designs for soft electronics. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15894.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , . An autonomously electrically self-healing liquid metal-elastomer composite for robust soft-matter robotics and electronics. Nat Mater. 2018;17:618-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Mussel-inspired cellulose nanocomposite tough hydrogels with synergistic self-healing, adhesive, and strain-sensitive properties. Chem Mater. 2018;30:3110-21.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , . Electronic skin: Opportunities and challenges in convergence with machine learning. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2024;26:331-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , et al. Regional and correlative sweat analysis using high-throughput microfluidic sensing patches toward decoding sweat. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw9906.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , . Thin, soft, skin-mounted microfluidic networks with capillary bursting valves for chrono-sampling of sweat. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:1601355.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. Wearable microsensor array for multiplexed heavy metal monitoring of body fluids. ACS Sens. 2016;1:866-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Functional-hydrogel-based electronic-skin patch for accelerated healing and monitoring of skin wounds. Biomaterials. 2025;314:122802.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , . Will electronic skins be the next miraculous skin care devices? J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143:2102-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections