Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Images/Instruments in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Images/Instruments in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Focus
Images/Instrument in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Images/Instruments in Dermatology/Dermatosurgery
Innovations
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Living Legends
Looking back in history
Original Article
Perspective
Resident Forum
Review Article
Spot the Diagnosis
Tropical Dermatology
Visual Treats in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2026
:6;
88
doi:
10.25259/CSDM_121_2026

Proportion of body dysmorphic disorder among medical students in a tertiary care teaching hospital: A cross-sectional study

Department of Dermatology, Dr Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Department of Community Medicine, Dr Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Author image
Corresponding author: Mia George Kallumkal, Department of Community Medicine, Dr Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College, Karakonam, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. miagkallumkal@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kizhakkel AJ, Samson JF, Kallumkal MG, Maneek KF. Proportion of body dysmorphic disorder among medical students in a tertiary care teaching hospital: A cross-sectional study. CosmoDerma. 2026;6:88. doi: 10.25259/CSDM_121_2026

Abstract

Objectives:

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by excessive preoccupation with perceived defects in physical appearance, often leading to significant emotional distress and impaired functioning. Emerging evidence suggests that young adults, particularly medical students, may be increasingly vulnerable to body image concerns due to academic pressures, social comparison, and heightened exposure to appearance-related standards. Despite its potential impact on mental health, BDD remains underdiagnosed and understudied in this population, especially in the Indian context. People affected with BDD do undergo multiple cosmetic procedures to correct their perceived imperfections. This study is to assess the screen-positive proportion of BDD among medical students in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Kerala, India, and the socio-demographic profile of students screened positive for this disorder.

Materials and Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted among first, second, third, and final year medical students, using systematic random sampling to select 200 participants. Data were collected through a pretested, validated semi-structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The data was collated using Excel 2021 and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) software.

Results:

Out of 200 participants, 67 students (33.5%) expressed concerns about their body image by positively responding to BDD-Questionnaire questions. Using the BDDQ, 9% (18 students) of the participants screened positive for BDD. Among the 67 students who expressed concerns about body image, primary concerns were related to overweight/obesity (p = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) = 6.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89–21.74) and shape of lips (p = 0.021, OR = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.35–13.91).

Conclusion:

This study highlights a notable proportion of medical students who screened positive for BDD. These results emphasize the urgency to address issues with body image and mental health among students, underlining the need for targeted remedies.

Keywords

Body dysmorphic disorder
Body image
Medical students
Mental health
Screening

INTRODUCTION

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is “a mental health condition where a person spends a lot of time worrying about flaws in their appearance.” These flaws are often unnoticeable to others.[1]

Individuals with BDD often have a negative perception of their own body image that leads to significant negative emotions, thus affecting their daily functioning. People spend a lot of time juxtaposing their looks with others, stare at mirrors looking at themselves, or avoid mirrors altogether, and make multiple efforts to camouflage their flaws. A person with BDD shows excessive worrying about their body parts, and they tend to recheck themselves in front of mirrors and cover their body parts. It can start as a shame towards your own body and then can progress gradually to grievous consequences.[1]

Most of us have imperfections in us, but when these flaws create an overwhelming reaction in a person, then these are said to be BDD. People affected with BDD do undergo multiple cosmetic procedures to correct their perceived imperfections. Fear of judgment built in them can lead them to avoid social gatherings.[2] If left untreated, BDD can generate severe depression and suicidal thoughts.[3]

Diagnosing BDD is the first step for treatment.[1] A limited number of studies are available regarding the screen-positive proportion and magnitude of BDD in college students, particularly medical students. Body image dissatisfaction was quite high in the medical students in a study conducted by Taqui et al, in which the majority of the students reported that they were concerned about some aspect of their appearance.[1,4]

The main intention of this study is to estimate the screen-positive proportion of BDD among the medical students in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Kerala, India, and also to find the socio-demographic profile of students screened positive for this disorder. Our study also aims to decrease the incidence of grievous effects of this disorder, such as self-doubt, depression, and suicide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

Institution-based cross-sectional study.

Study settings

The Study was conducted among the medical students of a tertiary medical facility.

Study Period

The study was conducted for 6 months, after getting the institutional ethics committee’s approval in May 2024(Ethics committee No. SMCSIMCH/EC(PHARM)03/07/14).

Data collection period

2 months from May to July 2024.

Study population

Students of a tertiary medical facility in South Kerala. A sample size of 195 participants, approximated to 200 participants, was calculated considering the relative deviate at 95% confidence level (CI) (1.96) and the prevalence of BDD among Chinese medical students as 33 %.[5]

Sampling technique

A stratified sampling method was followed, where 4 strata were defined, corresponding to 4 years (1st year to 4th year), with each of the batches consisting of 150 students, accounting for a total of 600 students. From each stratum, systematic random sampling was used to select 50 students. From the attendance register, the list of total (150) students in each year was obtained. The sampling interval was calculated by dividing the total number of students by the required sample size from each stratum (150/50=3). A random number between 1 and 3 was selected as the starting number, and the sampling interval was consecutively added until 50 students were obtained from each stratum.

Inclusion criteria

Medical students (1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year) who gave informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Medical students who did not give consent.

Study tools

A pretested, semi-structured, validated[6] questionnaire was used to collect data. The BDD questionnaire has two sections:

Section A – Socio-Demographic Details.

Section B – BDD-Questionnaire questions[6]

The BDD-Questionnaire consists of a set of questions addressing BDD symptoms. If the participant responds positively to one question, then only the subsequent question is asked. A score of 4 points or above is considered positive BDD screening according to BDDQ, where the person responds that he/she has a preoccupation with appearance, and this leads to significant distress. This is a screening tool with no stratification of positive results.

Ethical consideration

On approval of the Institutional Human Ethical Committee (IEC No. SMCSIMCH/EC(PHARM)03/07/14), the study was carried out. Written informed consent was acquired. Confidentiality of the subjects was always maintained by keeping personal identifying information private. Data was entered and stored in a password-protected system, which is accessible to the principal investigator and guide. Adequate permissions were taken before the data collection. Collected data was used only for study purposes.

Statistical analysis

Data collection was via Google Forms. Excel 2021 was used to enter all of the data that had been gathered. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Version 21 was used for analysis. Quantitative data were expressed in mean and standard deviation, and qualitative data were expressed each with redness and paleness. as frequencies and percentages. When expected cell counts were adequate for categorical variables, the Pearson chi-square test was used; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was utilized for statistical association. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was also calculated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was found to be 21.47±1.48 years. Our study population included the majority of female medical students, forming 65.5 % (131) of the participants (N=200). The mean height of the study population was found to be 164.23±9.8 centimeters. The mean weight of the study population was found to be 61.13±13.87 kilograms.

The mean BMI of the study population was found to be 22.48 ± 3.71, as depicted in Table 1. The median time of the 182(91%) participants was found to be under an hour. Only 18(9%) participants had a mirror time over 1hour. Among the study population, 143(71.5%) participants were bothered about their hair, 72(36.0%) participants were concerned about being fat, and 30(15.0%) participants were concerned about being thin.

Table 1: Body mass index measured among the study population (N=200).
BMI category N(%)
Underweight 24(12%)
Normal weight 134(67%)*
Overweight 32(16%)
Obese 10(5%)
:The majority of our study population belonged to the category of normal BMI (Body mass index).

Graph 1 implies that among 200 study participants, 95 (47.5%) individuals were bothered about acne or scars, followed by 42(21.1%) participants with other skin issues, 18(9%) participants with wrinkles, and 15(7.5%) participants

Bothered about skin (N=200).
Graph 1: Bothered about skin (N=200).

Graph 2 implies that among 200 participants, 65(32.7%) individuals were bothered about shape of abdomen, followed by 39(19.6%) individuals about nose, 38(19.1%) participants about hips, 27(13.6%) individuals about mouth, 24(12.1%) individuals about lips and 21(10.6%) individuals about shape of jaw.

Bothered about the shape of body parts (N=200).
Graph 2: Bothered about the shape of body parts (N=200).

Among 200 participants, 20(10.1%) individuals were bothered about parts of the body other than the genitals, breast, and hand. Our study concluded that more than half of the study population were not bothered by any body part in particular, as depicted in Graph 3.

Bothered about various body parts (N=200).
Graph 3: Bothered about various body parts (N=200).

Among the 200 participants, 67 participants responded positively to the BDDQ scoring questionnaire, and they were administered the subsequent questions. Therefore, n changes to 67. Among the 67 participants who positively responded to BDDQ, 18 participants had a score of 4 points or above, which is regarded as positive for BDD according to BDDQ.

Our study concluded that 9% of the medical students screened positive for BDD using BDDQ. Among the 67 students who expressed concerns about body image, primary concerns were related to overweight/obesity (p = 0.004, OR = 6.41, 95% CI: 1.89–21.74) and shape of lips (p = 0.021, OR = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.35–13.91) as depicted in Table 2.

Table 2: Association between socio-demographic variables and BDD (n=67). Among the 200 participants, 67 participants responded positively to the BDDQ scoring questionnaire, and they were administered the subsequent questions. The rest of the participants were not administered further questions as mentioned in the BDDQ. Therefore, n changes to 67.
Variable Categories Body dysmorphic disorder screened with BDDQ. (n=67) p-value Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Screen-positive Screen- negative
Sex Male 6(40.0%) 9(60.0%) 0.165 0.45 0.13–1.61
Female 12(23.1%) 40(76.9%)
BMI Underweight and normal weight 8(16.3%) 41(83.7%) 0.004* 6.41 1.89–21.74
Overweight and obese 10(55.6%) 8(44.4%)
Mirror time per day Under an hour 16(27.1%) 43(72.9%) 0.634 0.90 0.16–4.95
Over 2 hours 2(25%) 6(75%)
Bothered about skin issues:
A) Wrinkles
Yes 3(30.0%) 7(70.0%) 0.540 1.20 0.26–5.54
No 15(26.3%) 42(73.7%)
B) Redness Yes 2(40.0%) 3(60.0%) 0.408 1.92 0.29–12.54
No 16(25.8%) 46(74.2%)
C) Paleness Yes 3(37.5%) 5(62.5%) 0.366 1.76 0.38–8.23
No 15(25.4%) 44(74.6%)
D) Acne/scars Yes 10(24.4%) 31(75.6%) 0.382 0.73 0.25–2.18
No 8(30.8%) 18(69.2%)
E) Other skin issues Yes 6(27.3%) 16(72.7%) 0.589 1.03 0.33–3.24
No 12(26.7%) 33(73.3%)
Bothered about hair Yes 16(26.7%) 44(73.3%) 0.612 0.91 0.16–5.32
No 2(28.6%) 5(71.4%)
Bothered about the shape of:
A) Nose
Yes 6(23.1%) 20(76.9%) 0.396 0.73 0.24–2.22
No 12(29.3%) 29(70.7%)
B) Mouth Yes 5(33.3%) 10(66.7%) 0.369 1.50 0.43–5.18
No 13(25.0%) 39(75.0%)
C) Jaw Yes 7(46.7%) 8(53.3%) 0.055 3.26 0.97–10.97
No 11(21.2%) 41(78.8%)
D) Lips Yes 9(47.4%) 10(52.6%) 0.021* 4.33 1.35–13.91
No 9(18.8%) 39(81.3%)
E) Abdomen Yes 12(36.4%) 21(63.6%) 0.073 2.67 0.85–8.40
No 6(17.6%) 28(82.4%)
F) Hips Yes 7(29.2%) 17(70.8%) 0.483 1.20 0.39–3.73
No 11(25.6%) 32(74.4%)
Bothered about any body parts:
A) Hand
Yes 2(50.0%) 2(50.0%) 0.291 2.94 0.38–22.57
No 16(25.4%) 47(74.6%)
C) Breast Yes 5(55.6%) 4(44.4%) 0.051 4.33 0.97–19.41
No 13(22.4%) 45(77.6%)
D) Other parts Yes 4(26.7%) 11(73.3%) 0.631 0.99 0.26–3.79
No 14(26.9%) 38(73.1%)

Fischer’s exact test was used for testing significance. *:Statistically significant. BMI: Body mass index, BDDQ: Body dysmorphic disorder questionnaire. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that 18(9%) participants screened positive for BDD using BDDQ, while the majority of the participants do not reveal any signs of BDD. The proportion of positively screened BDD participants found in our study is consistent with the findings of a cross-sectional study conducted in Goa among 378 students of a medical college, where the prevalence of BDD was found to be 6.9%.[7]A similar study was done in Kerala among medical students, which estimated a screen-positive proportion of 18%.[8]The screen-positive proportion of BDD is higher in our study as compared to the cross-sectional study conducted among 156 medical students in Pakistan.[4]The higher proportion of positively screened BDD participants among our study population could be attributed to various factors. Societal norms warrant better grooming and emphasis on the appearance of doctors at the workplace, which is thereby followed in medical colleges to ensure implementation of the same as the students graduate into health practitioners.[4]

The most common foci of concern among the participants were found to be regarding hair. This finding can be attributed to the portrayal of well-groomed individuals in the media that distorts the perceived body image and fosters a feeling of mismatched body proportions. As the exposure to media starts from a very young age, the concepts of a healthy body, once distorted, are ingrained since childhood unless addressed. The forms of media that are widely available encompass advertisements of hair products on social media platforms with celebrity and influencer handles that simulate unrealistic beauty standards.[9]Among the skin issues, acne poses a major concern among our study population. This finding is in line with the findings of a cross-sectional, double-center study among 156 study participants in Amsterdam. The aforementioned study revealed that 12.4% of young adult participants diagnosed with acne vulgaris were screened positive for BDD. These findings imply that adults seeking health care advice for self-assessed skin problems are an at-risk group for BDD.[10] The majority of the study population were bothered by the shape of the abdomen. Participants with overweight or obesity had significantly higher odds of BDD as assessed by our study. This finding was consistent with the findings of an empirical study conducted among 200 individuals, where 13% of the participants were insecure about their abdomen. The entry of ‘diet-culture’ and ‘fat phobia’ into the daily conversations of young adults in the recent past has facilitated the emergence of symptoms of BDD.[11] Literature points out fixation on symmetry or perfectionism of various body parts among individuals with BDD. The majority of our study population were not concerned about any particular body part. This spared the study individuals from critical inner dialogue and scrutiny, contrary to the findings from various qualitative studies conducted among young adults.[12,13]

Avoidance and concealment are various safety-seeking measures or behavior patterns observed in individuals who are likely to develop BDD.[12] These practices were reported by fewer than half of the study population. However, comparison of perceived flaws with people around and in magazines or on television adds to the likelihood of developing BDD. This finding is in line with the findings of our study population. Feeling of internal shame and a need for external validation among the young adults poses a challenge in overcoming the proportion of BDD among young adults.[14]

Orthodontic treatments are of great popularity among young adults to whom body image is relevant. In a cross-sectional study conducted among 1184 patients who sought orthodontic procedures, 5.2% individuals were screened positive for BDD. Among individuals concerned about their body, the head and face are common areas of concern.[15] Appearance comparison and fixation on physical defects is a common behavior observed among individuals with BDD.[16]

Our study did not reveal any significant association between concern regarding the shape of the jaw and the screen-positive proportion of BDD. Rise in awareness regarding orthodontic and cosmetic procedures has led to a significant increase in these procedures for concerns of the jaw, which is contrary to our findings.[15] Studies in the past concluded that a focus of concern among patients with BDD is the shape of the lips.[17] Similar conclusions were drawn from our study. Concern over any defect in the breast was not found to be associated with the screen-positive proportion of BDD among our study population. This finding is contrary to the conclusion of a cross-sectional study conducted among higher secondary school students in Imphal. Concerns and insecurities experienced during adolescence often persist into adulthood, contributing to the development of BDD in many individuals. Therefore, it is essential to integrate greater awareness and support for BDD within school and mental health programs to promote early intervention and prevention.[18,19]

Limitations

The sample size was limited, and the participants were exclusively medical students, a group that may differ from the general population in terms of awareness, stress levels, and attitudes toward appearance, which may have affected the robustness of the findings. This restricts the broader applicability of the results. Since anonymity was an option, the majority of the participants, including those who screened positive for BDD, opted not to reveal their identity. Thus, we were unable to direct them to proper counseling and psychiatric help.

CONCLUSION

According to our study, out of the 200 participants, 18 students (9%) were screened positive for BDD according to BDDQ. Among the 67 students who expressed concerns about body image, primary concerns were related to overweight/obesity (p = 0.004, OR = 6.41, 95% CI: 1.89– 21.74) and shape of lips (p = 0.021, OR = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.35– 13.91).

These results highlight the urgency to address issues with body image and mental health among students, underlining the need for targeted remedies. Therefore, more research is advised to ascertain the scope of the issue, and BDD should receive greater attention in school and mental health initiatives.

Acknowledgment:

With our continuous effort, this study was selected for the KUHS Research Appreciation Award 2024(Reference Id: KUHSRESUG0153).

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College, Karakoram, Trivandrum, Kerala, Number SMCSIMCH/EC(Pharm)03/07/14, dated 14th May 2024.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Body dysmorphic disorder: Gender differences and prevalence in a Pakistani medical student population. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Body dysmorphic disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12:221-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Body dysmorphic disorder, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms in Chinese medical students. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45:963-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Validation of the body dysmorphic disorder questionnaire in a community sample of Swedish women. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210:647-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Appearance comparison in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder and controls. Body Image. 2015;15:132-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . "I will be at death's door and realize that I've wasted maybe half of my life on one body part": The experience of living with body dysmorphic disorder. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016;20:191-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . "I once stared at myself in the mirror for eleven hours": Exploring mirror gazing in participants with body dysmorphic disorder. J Health Psychol. 2016;21:2647-57.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Body dysmorphic disorder in adolescents. Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;9:44-57.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder among patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . The prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in the community: A systematic review. Glob Psychiatry Arch. 2021;4:130-54.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. . An empirical study on the causes of body dysmorphic disorder or BDD and fatphobia and their adverse effects on mental health of people in India. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2021;10:284-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Body image dissatisfaction among medical students in the Southern district of Kerala: A cross-sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2022;9:3166.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Epidemiology of body dysmorphic disorder among adolescents in Imphal West District, Manipur. Natl J Community Med. 2022;13:469-72.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Body dysmorphic disorder and self-esteem in adolescents and young adults with acne vulgaris. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023;103:adv6232.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder among Lebanese university students: Associated risk factors and repercussion on mental health. J Prev Med Hyg. 2024;64:E481-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in college-going students: A quantitative study. Indian J Clin Psychiatry. 2024;4:42-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . The experiences of individuals with body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Body Image. 2024;50:101727.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Body Dysmorphic Disorder Foundation Information for educational professionals (school & uni) - BDDF. Available from: https://bddfoundation.org/support/supporting-someone-with-bdd/information-for-educational-professionals/ [Last accessed on 2025 Mar 20]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Evaluation of body dysmorphic disorder in hair transplant patients. Acta Med Int. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/amit/fulltext/2015/02010/evaluation_of_body_dysmorphic_disorder_in_hair.20.aspx [Last accessed on 2025 Mar 20]
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections