Priority scientific articles for cosmoderma

Writing scientific articles is an integral part of the scientific community and a key practice for communicating research findings. However, writing is not merely about reporting results – it also serves as a powerful tool to uncover new thoughts and ideas. It compels us to think in a structured, logical manner, rather than a chaotic one. By writing, we can distil years of research, data, and analysis into an original narrative, thereby clarifying our message and highlighting the impact of our work. Handwriting, in particular, is known to stimulate widespread brain connectivity and has been shown to positively affect learning and memory. The importance of human-generated scientific writing cannot be overstated, especially in the era of artificial intelligence.

Medical publishing plays a key role in academic medicine. It contributes to the advancement and dissemination of science and is often a prerequisite for career progression. High-impact journals are those that publish influential research – studies that can change clinical practice, introduce novel findings, and garner significant citations.

In dermatology, highly cited articles frequently include clinical trials, prevalence studies, or research on emerging or “hot” topics. For Cosmoderma, articles should focus on cosmetic dermatology, esthetic dermatology, esthetic surgery, lasers, lights, and skin lightening. Key elements such as relevance, novelty, and practicality often influence the initial editorial evaluation of a manuscript.

A common reason for manuscript rejection is the insufficient reporting of methods. Given the visual nature of the specialty, high-quality images enhance the manuscript and improve comprehension. All findings – whether positive or negative, significant or non-significant – must be reported. Accurately interpreting and explaining the results’ significance is essential, particularly in the discussion section.

It is important to note that statistical significance does not always equate to clinical relevance, especially when differences are minor. Conversely, large differences can be clinically important even in the absence of statistical significance, often due to small sample sizes. Therefore, the strength of the results should not rely solely on P-values but also on whether the differences are clinically meaningful. A well-rounded discussion must also include a clear and honest report of the study’s limitations.

An enticing title that concisely reflects the study’s content and type can help generate reader interest. When preparing the manuscript, authors must strictly adhere to the journal’s author guidelines and formatting requirements. Finally, developing strong scientific writing skills takes time and mentorship. Seeking feedback and guidance from experienced mentors can be invaluable during the publishing process, from drafting to submission, answering reviewer’s comments and doing proofs corrections.