Translate this page into:
Hyperpigmented palmoplantar macules
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Kumar N. Hyperpigmented palmoplantar macules. CosmoDerma. 2026;6:99. doi: 10.25259/CSDM_155_2026
A 25-year-old man presented to our outpatient department with a complaint of asymptomatic, hyperpigmented, flat lesions over the palms and soles for 5 months. He had no other cutaneous or systemic complaints. Cutaneous examination revealed multiple brownish-black macules of varying sizes, ranging from 1 × 1 cm to 2 × 2 cm, presented over the palms and soles [Figure 1a and b]. There was no lymphadenopathy, generalized rash, or oral mucosal lesions on examination. On detailed history taking, he revealed a history of unprotected sexual intercourse with multiple male and female partners. Genital examination revealed a healed scar over the prepuce of the penis [Figure 1c], suggestive of a previous chancre.

Serological investigations revealed non-reactive results for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B and C, while the venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test was reactive with a titer of 1:128, confirmed by a positive treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA) test. Based on clinical findings and serological evidence, a diagnosis of secondary syphilis was established. The patient was treated with intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, 2.4 million units administered once. He was counseled regarding safe sexual practices and the importance of consistent condom use. Partner notification was advised, and he was requested to bring his sexual partner(s) for counseling, clinical evaluation, and appropriate screening during the subsequent visit.[1] The differential diagnosis of palmoplantar pigmentation includes post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, tinea nigra, acral melanocytic lesions, and lichen planus. Hyperpigmented palmoplantar macules are a crucial diagnostic clue. As the “great imitator,” secondary syphilis exhibits a broad range of morphological variations, including macular, papular, papulosquamous, lichenoid, annular, nodular, pustular, follicular, and pigmentary.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The author certifies that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The author confirms that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- When secondary syphilis is reliably recognizable. J Am Acad Dermatol 2026 Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2026.06.002
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
