Translate this page into:
Dermatologists’ perspectives on daily gentle exfoliation for sensitive and oily/acne-prone skin: Insights from a national survey

*Corresponding author: Sameer Jadhwar, Department of Medical Affairs, Galderma India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. sameer.jadhwar@galderma.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Das A, Sen D, Jadhwar S. Dermatologists’ perspectives on daily gentle exfoliation for sensitive and oily/acne-prone skin: Insights from a national survey. CosmoDerma. 2025;5:124. doi: 10.25259/CSDM_164_2025
Abstract
Objectives:
Sensitive skin, now recognized as a distinct clinical phenotype, affects nearly 60–70% of women and 50–60% of men globally, with Indians reporting among the highest levels of skin sensitivity. Patients with sensitive and oily/acne-prone skin often experience compromised barrier function, heightened reactivity, and pigmentation concerns, necessitating gentle yet effective skincare strategies. Exfoliation plays a critical role in epidermal renewal and pigmentation control, but conventional methods risk irritation and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in melanin-rich populations. To address this, micro-dosed combinations of alpha-hydroxy acids, beta-hydroxy acids, and polyhydroxy acids have emerged as promising options for safe daily exfoliation. This survey aimed to evaluate the clinical positioning of the Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating salicylic acid (SA) range, discern formulation preferences, and identify perceived challenges and opportunities.
Materials and Methods:
A cross-sectional, structured questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 106 dermatologists attending DERMACON 2025. Participants received a scientific briefing on the Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA range (cleanser and lotion) before completing an eight-item survey. Questions explored therapeutic use, formulation preferences, potential indications, and clinical reservations. Responses were anonymized and analyzed using descriptive statistics, while open-ended feedback was thematically categorized.
Results:
Most dermatologists (88.7%) identified oily and acne-prone skin as the primary indication for daily gentle exfoliation, highlighting its role in sebum regulation, comedogenesis prevention, and texture improvement. Notably, 63.2% also endorsed its use in sensitive skin, reflecting increasing confidence in micro-dosed exfoliant formulations. Additional reported indications included keratosis pilaris (29.2%), post-inflammatory pigmentation, rough/bumpy skin, and post-acne maintenance. Nearly half of the respondents (46.2%) preferred a dual regimen combining cleanser and lotion, citing synergistic benefits of cleansing, exfoliation, hydration, and extended contact time. Cleanser-only use was favored by 31.1%, primarily for simplicity and compliance, while 16.9% preferred the lotion alone. Only 5.7% of dermatologists avoided exfoliation, typically in patients with active dermatitis or marked barrier compromise. Concerns raised included the need for India-specific clinical data (n = 17), differentiation from cosmetic exfoliants (n = 9), and guidance on combining with other actives such as retinoids (n = 6).
Conclusions:
Indian dermatologists demonstrated strong acceptance of daily, gentle chemical exfoliation for oily/acne-prone and sensitive skin, with a clear preference for combination regimens that balance efficacy with barrier support. The incorporation of mandelic acid, salicylic acid, and gluconolactone in low concentrations was perceived as an innovation enabling safe exfoliation in populations historically considered high risk. These findings highlight a paradigm shift toward barrier-preserving exfoliation strategies in Indian dermatology practice and reinforce the therapeutic potential of micro-dosed acid formulations for sensitive and acne-prone skin, while addressing evidence gaps specific to Indian skin types.
Keywords
Acne
Dermatologist perspectives
Exfoliation
India
Sensitive skin
INTRODUCTION
Sensitive skin, once considered a mere cosmetic concern, is now recognized as a distinct clinical phenotype requiring specialized dermatologic care. It is characterized by an increased propensity to experience discomfort such as burning, stinging, tightness, or dryness in response to stimuli that are otherwise non-irritating. These reactions typically occur without visible inflammation and are often attributed to underlying barrier dysfunction, neurosensory hyperactivity, or subclinical inflammation.[1]
Globally, the prevalence of sensitive skin ranges from 50% to 70%, with evidence suggesting an increase due to urbanization and lifestyle changes.[2] India ranks among the highest globally in self-reported skin sensitivity, with a mean sensitivity score of 3.4, surpassing the international average.[3] Sensitive skin is a widespread dermatologic concern, affecting 60–70% of women and 50–60% of men.[1,4] Over the past two decades, a 55% increase in individuals self-reporting sensitive skin has been observed, suggesting an upward trend potentially linked to urbanization, pollution, and increased cosmetic use.[5]
Notably, 40% of patients with sensitive skin present without any identifiable underlying skin diseases, reinforcing the recognition of sensitive skin as an independent clinical entity.[6,7] These findings underscore the need for targeted non-irritating skincare solutions that preserve skin barrier integrity and minimize the risk of exacerbating symptoms. In the Indian context, the burden of sensitive skin is compounded by environmental and dermatologic factors, such as high levels of ambient pollution, widespread use of hard water, prevalent phototypes IV–VI, and a growing market for unregulated cosmetic procedures.[8] Chronic low-grade neurogenic inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of skin sensitivity. This persistent inflammation disrupts epidermal renewal, resulting in thickened epidermis, altered stratum corneum, and impaired desquamation, which gradually leads to uneven skin texture, roughness, patchy pigmentation, and increased barrier vulnerability.[9]
Hyperpigmentation, particularly post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), is a common sequela in Indian and other darker skin types and is closely linked to chronic inflammation. Inflammatory mediators activate melanocytes, leading to an increase in melanin production. Melanin is synthesized and stored in melanosomes,[10-12] which are transferred to keratinocytes, where they accumulate, particularly when desquamation is impaired. Since melanin is not enzymatically degraded in humans, it can only be eliminated through cell turnover and exfoliation.[13,14] This highlights the critical importance of controlled exfoliation in reducing the melanin burden and improving skin tone uniformity in pigmentation-prone populations.
For individuals with sensitive skin, chemical exfoliation must be gentle and precisely targeted to avoid exacerbating inflammation. Effective formulations are designed to act on the superficial stratum corneum without disrupting deeper layers. Gentle exfoliation enhances keratinocyte turnover, smooths skin texture, and reduces pigmentation by facilitating the removal of melanin-loaded keratinocytes, while preserving barrier function.[15] The frequent and unregulated use of fairness products, harsh exfoliating scrubs, and depigmenting agents further aggravates barrier damage and pigmentation issues in Indian skin.[16] Moreover, oily and acne-prone skin conditions are highly prevalent in India, with approximately 47% of individuals with sensitive skin also reporting acne. Post-acne sequelae, including PIH, textural irregularities, and scarring, are commonly observed and may persist long after the active lesions resolve.[17]
Chemical exfoliation offers a strategic intervention to address these concerns. Alpha-hydroxy acids (AHAs), beta-hydroxy acids (BHAs), and polyhydroxy acids (PHAs) form the foundation of modern exfoliation regimens. AHAs such as mandelic acid and glycolic acid promote desmosomal loosening and corneocyte shedding; mandelic acid, owing to its larger molecular weight, is especially favored in sensitive skin because of its slow penetration and reduced irritancy. BHAs such as salicylic acid are lipid-soluble, allowing deeper follicular penetration, which is ideal for comedonal acne and seborrhea. PHAs such as gluconolactone and lactobionic acid provide hydrating and antioxidant benefits, further enhancing barrier resilience and offering a gentler alternative suitable for barrier-compromised skin.[18]
Exfoliation stimulates basal keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal turnover,[19] clears pores of debris, enhances collagen production, and improves skin texture. However, over-exfoliation can induce microtrauma and exacerbate sensitivity, particularly in the skin of colored populations prone to PIH. Therefore, controlled exfoliation using appropriate agents and dosages is essential.[19,20] Compared to mechanical methods, chemical exfoliation offers a more uniform and less traumatic means of enhancing skin turnover. Physical exfoliation, such as scrubs or microdermabrasion, is often too abrasive for sensitive skin and can lead to erythema and barrier disruption.[19,21] AHAs, BHAs, and PHAs differ in their penetration profiles, making it possible to tailor exfoliation strategies to sensitive skin.[21,22] Optimal regimens selectively target the superficial stratum corneum, minimizing inflammation and maintaining skin integrity.[23-25]
The American Academy of Dermatology guidance for exfoliation at home includes the use of mild chemical exfoliants over mechanical methods for individuals with dry, sensitive, or acne-prone skin.[25]
Although exfoliation offers significant clinical benefits, it must be customized for sensitive populations. Gentle chemical exfoliation using AHAs, BHAs, and PHAs, in the optimal doses, enables daily skin renewal while reducing the risk of inflammation. These principles form the basis of emerging skincare strategies focused on the sensitive, pigmented, and post-acne Indian skin types.
To explore real-world dermatological perspectives on daily exfoliation of sensitive Indian skin, a structured survey was conducted among dermatologists attending DERMACON 2025. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical positioning of the SA range, discern formulation preferences, and identify perceived challenges and opportunities. The questionnaire consisted of eight questions that explored its role in therapy, preferred formulation (cleanser, lotion, or both [in the same or different patients]), application in other indications, initial impressions, feedback, and any concerns or clinical reservations of a novel, gentle exfoliating formulation designed for Indian skin types.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nationwide survey in India to explore dermatologists’ perspectives on daily gentle exfoliation for sensitive and acne-prone skin, which is a population historically considered unsuitable for routine exfoliation due to barrier fragility and high pigmentation risk. It highlights a paradigm shift in clinical practice toward barrier-preserving exfoliation strategies, enabled by the use of a novel micro-dosed triple-acid (AHA–BHA–PHA) system. These findings provide unique insights into formulation preferences, therapeutic positioning, and emerging clinical behaviors, while addressing evidence gaps specific to Indian skin types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
This was a cross-sectional, descriptive, questionnaire-based survey conducted with 106 dermatologists attending DERMACON 2025 in Jaipur from February 06 to 09, 2025, to evaluate their perceptions and experiences related to the Cetaphil SA range.
Study population
The inclusion criterion was dermatologists registered with the Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists, and Leprologists (IADVL). The exclusion criteria were nonIADVL-registered dermatologists and general practitioners.
Study procedure
Following a scientific briefing on the Cetaphil SA range (comprising the Cetaphil Gentle exfoliating SA cleanser and the Cetaphil Gentle exfoliating SA lotion), the participants were asked to complete a standardized questionnaire.
Respondents
The participants were dermatologists from private clinics (59%), hospitals (28%), and academic institutions (13%) representing a geographically diverse sample across India.
Participation was voluntary and anonymous, and no incentives were provided.
Data Handling and Statistical Analysis: Before being analyzed, every response was coded and anonymized. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as appropriate) were used to summarize quantitative data. Thematic grouping and qualitative analysis were used to find recurring themes and insights in the open-ended responses. No inferential statistical analyses were conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 106 dermatologists participated in a structured questionnaire-based survey conducted at DERMACON 2025, subsequent to a scientific briefing on the Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA range. The survey aimed to capture real-world perceptions regarding the therapeutic role, formulation preference, extended indications, and concerns related to daily exfoliation in Indian skin types. The results were presented across four domains: therapeutic role, formulation usage, expressed concerns, and key qualitative insights.
Preferred place in therapy
When queried about the most pertinent therapeutic applications of the SA range, most dermatologists identified oily and acne-prone skin (88.7%) as the primary indication, emphasizing the necessity for regular yet gentle exfoliation to manage sebum control, comedogenesis, and rough texture. Notably, 63.2% of the respondents also expressed comfort in recommending the product for sensitive skin (affecting any skin type), indicating an evolving perspective on exfoliation in previously cautious populations. This shift was attributed to the presence of mandelic acid and gluconolactone, both of which are known for their gentle exfoliating action and barrier-preserving properties. A few respondents also mentioned their potential use in keratosis pilaris, post-acne pigmentation, and rough and bumpy skin on the limbs, indicating clinical versatility [Table 1 and Figure 1].

- Preferred therapeutic indications for exfoliation among health care professionals (HCPs) .
| Therapeutic Indication | % of respondents | n=106 |
|---|---|---|
| Oily/acne-prone skin | 88.7 | 94 |
| Sensitive skin (affecting any skin type) | 63.2 | 67 |
| Keratosis pilaris | 29.2 | 31 |
| Do not prefer exfoliation | 5.7 | 6 |
Other indications (open-ended responses)
Dermatologists provided open-ended responses on additional use cases where they would consider recommending the SA range. These reflect dermatologists’ openness to prescribing tolerable, gentle exfoliation as part of texture correction, post-inflammatory pigmentation management, and maintenance regimens for skin tone irregularities in Indian skin. Other indications are included in [Table 2].
| Additional indication | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Post-acne treatment (following conclusion of retinoid therapy) | 17 |
| Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation | 14 |
| Dull/photodamaged skin | 11 |
| Bumpy/rough texture on limbs/body | 9 |
Preferred formulation usage
Survey participants were also asked to share their preferences for product format: cleanser, lotion, or both (in the same or different patients). Nearly half (46.2%) favored the use of both products. In the same patients, compounding benefits could be perceived: the cleanser acts as an initiating exfoliant along with deep cleansing, while the lotion extends contact time and offers hydration. The next preferred format was the cleanser-only use, especially in mild cases or where patient compliance was a concern. Dermatologists preferred the lotion-only format for its extended contact time. A small proportion (5.7%) chose to avoid exfoliation altogether, typically because of active inflammatory dermatoses or previous experience (of irritation reported by patients) with similar products [Table 3].
| Formulation preference | % of respondents | n (106) |
|---|---|---|
| Both cleanser and lotion* | 46.2 | 49 |
| Cleanser only | 31.1 | 33 |
| Lotion only | 16.9 | 18 |
| Do not prefer exfoliation | 5.7 | 6 |
Concerns and clinical reservations
While the overall sentiment was predominantly positive, a few reservations were identified. These primarily pertain to clinical education, clarity of usage, and the necessity for supporting evidence rather than issues related to product safety or tolerability. The respondents underscored the importance of distinguishing the SA range from over-the-counter cosmetic exfoliators to prevent inappropriate usage. Furthermore, clear patient instructions and labeling clarity were recommended to mitigate misuse, particularly among patients unfamiliar with exfoliation or layering of the active ingredients [Table 4].
| Concern theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Need for Indian clinical experience with novel formulation | 17 |
| Overlap with cosmetic exfoliants | 9 |
| Concerns about active layering (e.g., retinoids) | 6 |
| Awareness gap for exfoliation guidance in Indian skin tones | 5 |
DISCUSSION
The findings from this dermatologist survey conducted at DERMACON 2025 underscore a significant shift in clinical dermatology toward gentle, daily exfoliation, even in populations traditionally considered unsuitable, such as those with sensitive or pigmented skin. Historically, exfoliation has been met with caution in Indian practice because of concerns about barrier disruption, PIH, and treatment non-adherence in melanin-rich phototypes.[26] However, the Cetaphil gentle exfoliation SA range appears to challenge and reframe these conventions.
A notable insight from the survey is the broad acceptance of exfoliation in oily, acne-prone skin (88.7%), aligning with the clinical priorities of managing comedogenesis, sebum excess, and uneven texture. Remarkably, 63.2% of dermatologists also expressed clinical comfort in recommending the SA range for sensitive skin. This represents a considerable paradigm shift, likely facilitated by the product’s micro-dosed triple-acid system, a blend of an AHA, BHA, and PHA, each selected for its balance of efficacy and tolerability. Respondents cited this innovation as critical for reintroducing exfoliation into care plans for patients who were previously deemed intolerant or high-risk.
Nearly half of all respondents (46.2%) preferred a dual regimen of cleansers and lotions, indicating an evolving preference for layered skincare strategies that combine exfoliation with cleansing and hydration. Dermatologists favoring the combined use noted synergistic benefits: the cleanser initiates deep cleansing and exfoliation, whereas the lotion sustains contact time and reinforces hydration. Conversely, dermatologists who favored the cleanser alone cited patient simplicity and greater ease of integration into daily acne management routines. Only a minority (5.7%) avoided exfoliation altogether, typically in patients with active dermatitis or barrier-compromised skin.
Insights from the survey suggest that while oily and acne-prone skin remains the primary indication, there is notable openness among dermatologists to extend their use to sensitive skin types, reflecting increased clinician trust in micro-dose formulations [Table 5]. However, concerns persist regarding potential misuse, overlapping active agents, and a lack of India-specific clinical data. These insights underline the critical need for healthcare education, prescribing guidance, and evidence generation to support the appropriate use of exfoliation products. Overall, feedback positions the Cetaphil SA range as a potential staple exfoliant in Indian dermatology, provided its introduction is coupled with clinical framework support and physician education.
| Clinical theme | Dermatologist insight |
|---|---|
| Use on oily and acne-prone skin | The SA range can be safely recommended as a daily-use exfoliant in oily and acne-prone skin. |
| Use on sensitive skin | Given the micro-dosed formulation and inclusion of mandelic acid and gluconolactone, exfoliation may be cautiously initiated in sensitive skin patients. |
| Combination use of cleanser and lotion | Using both products in tandem enhances tolerability and efficacy; the cleanser aids in deep cleansing and thereby reduces inflammation, and the lotion prolongs exfoliation with hydration. |
| Monotherapy with a cleanser | The cleanser alone may suffice in mild cases, or where simplicity and compliance are priorities (e.g., adolescents, sensitive users). |
| Avoidance in specific subgroups | Exfoliation may be withheld in patients with active dermatitis, barrier disruption, or a history of overuse of exfoliants. |
| Need for usage guidance | Prescribing should be accompanied by clear instructions on frequency, layering with other actives, and signs of overuse or irritation. |
| Preferred clinical scenarios | Besides acne and seborrhea, the range may be beneficial in post-acne pigmentation, keratosis pilaris, rough texture, and bumpy skin. |
| Patient counseling imperative | Patients should be educated that this is a dermatologically designed regimen – not a cosmetic scrub or peel – to prevent misuse. |
SA: Salicylic acid
The Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA Collection includes two key products: A gentle exfoliation SA cleanser and a gentle exfoliating SA lotion formulated for daily use to promote epidermal renewal without compromising skin comfort. They employ a triple acid “trifoliator system” combining mandelic acid (AHA), salicylic acid (BHA), and gluconolactone (PHA). Mandelic acid, with a larger molecular weight (152 g/mol), demonstrates reduced skin penetration, contributing to its milder exfoliation profile.[27] Salicylic acid, with its lower molecular weight (138 g/mol), penetrates deeper into pores to manage oil production and comedogenesis, while remaining well-tolerated at low concentrations.[28] Gluconolactone, a PHA (178 g/mol), provides gentle exfoliation with additional hydration and antioxidant benefits.[29]
The strategic selection of acids is critical. Larger molecular weight agents, such as mandelic acid and gluconolactone, penetrate more slowly and superficially, minimizing irritation risks compared to smaller acids such as glycolic acid (76 g/mol) or lactic acid (90 g/mol).[1,30] In addition, the formulations incorporate foundation ingredients – glycerin, panthenol (pro-Vitamin B5), and niacinamide (Vitamin B3) – to further bolster barrier support and skin hydration.[27]
The combination of exfoliation and barrier support aims to achieve progressive, mild exfoliation while minimizing inflammatory responses, which is a crucial balance for sensitive skin management.[27,28] In vitro and clinical data has demostrated that this formulation strategy enables safe, effective exfoliation even in individuals with skin sensitivity.[30]
In a comprehensive study involving 723 participants across multiple ethnicities, the Cetaphil gentle-exfoliated SA cleanser and lotion were evaluated for clinical safety and tolerability. The mean participant age was 52 years (range, 18–71 years), and 84% were female. Importantly, 36% self-reported sensitive skin, and 57% had Fitzpatrick Skin Type III, with representation from Types IV, V, and VI – populations with heightened PIH risk. No significant local tolerability issues or adverse events were reported with any of the products.[30] The high level of subject acceptance reinforces that daily exfoliation can be safely achieved in sensitive skin when appropriately formulated products are used.
The present study offers novel insights into the evolving landscape of exfoliation practices for sensitive and acne-prone Indian skin, addressing both scientific and clinical gaps in existing literature. The current research is the first systematic, single-center national survey (DERMACON 2025) to capture real-life dermatologists’ views on daily chemical exfoliation, going beyond earlier studies that mainly assessed efficacy or tolerability. The focus on sensitive, pigmented, and acne-prone skin, a population historically approached cautiously due to barrier fragility and heightened risk of PIH, highlights a paradigm shift toward barrier-preserving exfoliation strategies. Importantly, clinical evaluation of a novel micro-dosed triple-acid system (AHA–BHA–PHA), comprising low concentrations of mandelic acid, salicylic acid, and gluconolactone, was identified as a key innovation enabling safer daily use. Survey findings further reveal that a majority of dermatologists (63.2%) are now comfortable recommending daily exfoliation for sensitive skin, with nearly half favoring dual-regimen strategies (cleanser plus lotion), reflecting evolving clinical behaviors. Collectively, these findings begin to bridge a critical evidence gap specific to the Indian context, providing guidance on the differentiation of scientifically formulated exfoliants from conventional cosmetic products and informing practical usage recommendations.
This favorable safety profile is particularly significant given that sensitive skin populations, especially those with higher Fitzpatrick phototypes, are typically excluded from conventional exfoliation regimens because of concerns over irritation and pigmentation. The ability to provide a daily exfoliation regimen without these risks positions the Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA Collection as a valuable advancement for sensitive skin management.
Limitations
While the survey provides real-world insights from 106 dermatologists, it is limited by sampling at a single dermatology congress. In addition, open-ended responses were not quantitatively coded, which may underrepresent less common views. Future studies may shed further light by including patient follow-up assessments and outcomes.
CONCLUSION
The Cetaphil Gentle Exfoliating SA range was well received by dermatologists at DERMACON 2025, with a strong preference for its use in acne-prone, oily, and sensitive skin populations that often struggle with the tolerability of traditional exfoliants. The range’s micro-dosed AHA-BHA-PHA combination, distributed across a cleanser and a lotion, provides a unique opportunity to integrate exfoliation into daily, barrier-safe routines. Dermatologists valued the synergistic dual-use regimen, and many indicated a readiness to recommend the range across multiple dermatologic presentations, including comedonal acne, seborrheic skin, PIH, and even keratosis pilaris.
The findings signal a growing demand for functionally formulated skincare with clinical tolerability and underscore the potential of micro-dosing strategies to redefine exfoliation practice in Indian dermatology. To fully realize this opportunity, focused efforts are needed in generating India-specific data, offering clear regimen guidance, and ensuring differentiation from cosmetic exfoliants.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required as it is a cross-sectional, descriptive, questionnaire-based survey.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate consent from the participants.
Conflict of interest:
Dr. Sameer Jadhwar and Dr. Dyotona Sen are employees of Galderma. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Sensitive skin: A relevant syndrome, be aware. Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:3-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The prevalence of sensitive skin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:98.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Profiling of sensitive skin: India-specific subset analysis of the global epidemiological study assessing and characterizing sensitive skin In: Poster Presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Annual Meeting. 2025.
- [Google Scholar]
- The prevalence of self-declared sensitive skin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1779-88.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- What is sensitive skin? A systematic literature review of objective measurements. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;28:75-83.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5385.1 diverse and inclusive understanding of sensitive skin: A worldwide profiling. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;91:AB184.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Recognizing the impact of ambient air pollution on skin health. Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:2326-32.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2021. Available from: https://eadv.org/events/calendar/eadv/congress/2021 [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 01]
- Intrinsic and extrinsic regulation of human skin melanogenesis and pigmentation. Int Cosmet Sci. 2018;40:328-47.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- An explanation for the mysterious distribution of melanin in human skin: A rare example of asymmetric (melanin) organelle distribution during mitosis of basal layer progenitor keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:1115-26.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skin hyperpigmentation in Indian population: Insights and best practice. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61:487-95.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pigmentation disorders: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96:797-804.
- [Google Scholar]
- Melanin fate in the human epidermis: A reassessment of how best to detect and analyse histologically. Exp Dermatol. 2016;25:501-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galderma. 2024. Available from: https://www.galderma.com/search [Last accessed on 2025 Jul 14]
- [Google Scholar]
- Chemistry behind cosmetics: An extensive review. Scholar Int J Chem Meter Sci. 2019;2:54-79.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acne in Indian population: An epidemiological study evaluating multiple factors. Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;6:237-42.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Skincare bootcamp: The evolving role of skincare. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e1152.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosmetic formulation of skin care products New York: Marcel Dekker; 2006. Available from: https://farabipharma.ir/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Cosmetic-Formulation-of-Skin-Care-Products.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 01]
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cytokines and the skin barrier. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:6720-45.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sensitive skin syndrome: Research progress on mechanisms and applications. J Dermatol Sci Cosmet Technol. 2024;1:100015.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2867.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Review article: Skin care with exfoliation process. Int J Curr Sci (IJCSPUB). 2022;12:372.
- [Google Scholar]
- Galderma global advisory board data. 2021. Available from: https://www.galderma.com/search [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 01]
- [Google Scholar]
- Available from: https://www.aad.org/public/everyday/care/skin/care/secrets/routine/safely/exfoliate/at/home [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 01]
- Updates in the understanding and treatments of skin & hair disorders in women of color. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017;3:S21-37.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Efficacy and safety of a new peeling formulated with a pool of PHAs for the treatment of all skin types, even sensitive. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22:517-28.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2012;5:247-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The use of polyhydroxy acids (PHAs) in photoaged skin. Cutis. 2004;73(2 Suppl):3-13.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and invitro evaluation of Cetaphil SA cleanser and lotion. Available from: https://www.galderma.com/sites/default/files/2025-03/galderma_annual_report_2024.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Sep 08]
- [Google Scholar]

